Letter
Dear Editor,
I am currently enrolled to take college courses
for dual credit for high school. When I graduate
from high school I plan to stay on at North Lake
to finish off what would be my first semester
of university classes. I plan to major in political
science or more probably political economy.
As a result of my taking a government class here
(2301 with Gabriel Bach), I have since decided
that becoming at least more aware of local and
state politics — if not more active in them
— would be a good decision considering my
eventual major. It was with this in mind that
I decided to sort of jump into the Austin lobby
of April 13. Unfortunately for me, I did not know
what to expect from such an event and was quite
unprepared for my experience.
I realize it was my own fault for not understanding
what the lobby was actually about and, although
I agree with the “demands” of the
unions represented, I felt very much out of place
for two major reasons. 1) I do not belong to a
union; 2) I am not a state employee.
Considering that that is who the lobby was for,
I felt like I did not belong. However, my friends
and I found our own reasons to cheer and rant
and wave signs. My best friend found a sign for
MHMR. He chose this sign because his family was
affected by the decisions to cut funding. My other
friend found a poster for her father’s union
and began to chant, and I chanted for another
group whose primary concern was to have the Legislature
read its bills more carefully before signing them.
The lobby itself seemed at the beginning to be
very organized, with team leaders and organization
by district. They had public speakers and a fairly
orderly march around the capitol, and had even
set aside time to talk to the appropriate state
representatives about the issues. But as the lobby
wore on, I began to see that this lobby was little
more than a slightly organized protest rally and
that the planners — though they had set
aside time to talk to the representatives —
did not either inform the representatives that
they were coming to talk to them or know that
state congress was in session the entire day of
the rally. The end result was a lot of marching
noise, and then when it came time for talking
to the reps and getting things done, all of the
reps were in session and only a few of the representatives
that my group went to see had left their assistants
to speak with us.
All in all, my experience at the capitol was
rather time consuming and seemed less effective
than I would have hoped, but I have resolved that
next time I will attend lobbies that address specific
issues that affect me and try to work even harder
to make some kind of difference. This experience
has only told me that things like this need the
help of those who are interested, especially those
who are disappointed with past results.
Freedom of speech and assembly is a constitutional
right and I intend to use mine.
—David Bradshaw
|

In April, students of Dr. Bach’s
government class united in an effort to
make their voices heard at Irving’s
Town Meeting Forum which debuted the candidates
for the city’s election. “For
the first time in recent history, City Hall
was packed with young persons,” said
student Monica Ellington. “It was
a breath of fresh hope for Irving, for these
students represent the next generation’s
police chiefs, Catholic priests, business
owners, engineers and state legislators.”
|
| |
|