Why my vote doesn’t count
Electoral College, political parties reasons for voter apathy
By Oscar Bissot
Staff Writer
I wish I had the enthusiasm about
voting that some people have.
Unfortunately, I am very apathetic
towards the voting system we
have here.
The way the system is set up with
the Electoral College, you don't necessarily
need to win the popular vote
to be president, as was seen in the
2000 presidential election. As much
as I hear people saying that “your vote
does matter,” this is simply impossible.
In a national election, there are far too
many people voting to make your vote
of any importance.
I believe the main reason that voter
turnout is at a low level is political
parties. For example, during the 2004
election, when pretty much the majority
of the state of Texas was voting
for Bush, voting for Kerry would have
been futile. This is the case in other areas
as well.
The two-party system does not
work well. Of course, we have third
parties, but they are rarely taken seriously
by most people and barely get
five percent of the vote if they're lucky.
Increasing the number of candidates
from two to even four would increase
voter turnout.
However, local elections are better,
and more important, these I'd vote in
and support. Elections at the town level
are more personal, since they usually
have an impact on the individual.
A popular issue that is on the local ballot
for Irving is whether or not to allow
the sale of alcohol.
By all means, I don't hate democracy
— I just hate the current system
we have, which promotes a bipartisan
election system. To me, the Electoral
College isn't there to make voting easier,
it's here to keep the average citizen
from infl uencing the presidential election,
and to make it easier for someone
in power to remain in power and get
re-elected. |
Photos by George Brainard
Carole Keeton Strayhorn (top left), Rick Perry
(top right), Chris Bell (bottom left) and
Kinky Friedman (bottom right) are running
for Texas governor.
|
|