Gender, politics topics of talk
Spring symposium focused on 2008 presidential election
By Matt Keyser
Staff Writer
Hilary Clinton didn’t appear at
North Lake College this semester,
but she managed to dominate
a panel discussion on gender and
politics.
Students and faculty focused
much attention on next year’s presidential
election and Clinton’s candidacy.
“We guys are going to have to
start learning how to say ma’am,”
said sociology instructor Paul Magee.
But a quick show of hands
among about 60 students showed
that a majority would vote against
Clinton.
“She shows no emotion,”
one student said. “Whenever
you see her on TV, her face is
a stone.”
Another student, though, said
Clinton’s previous experience in
Washington would become valuable
if she were elected president.
Ivan Dole, a developmental reading
instructor, urged people not to
permit sexual stereotypes to cloud
their thinking.
“Women give birth to babies,”
Dole said. “Men don’t. Girls are
weak. Boys are tough.”
The first two statements are sexual
facts, Dole noted. The second
pair are nothing more than gender
bias.
At one point, the discussion
reached past gender issues to mix
politics with religion.
Should politicians’ religious
views determine whether they are
elected to office?
Magee said that should not be
the case.
“It doesn’t matter what a politician’s
faith is, as long as he or
she can run the government,” Magee
said. “When you’re about to
go in for open-heart surgery, you
aren’t going to ask: ‘How often
do you go to church?’ You’re going
to ask: ‘How many times have
you done this,’ and ‘How many
deaths?’”
One student was curious about
Magee’s position.
“How is it possible to take
the religion out of politics?” that
student asked. “When a senator
makes a vote on a bill, isn’t
somewhere, deep down, their religious
views helping with that
decision?”
Christan Amundsen, who teaches
psychology, religion and sociology,
urged students to come to future
North Lake symposiums on other
topics. He said they are a great
opportunity for students to voice
their opinions about current world
events.
“We do this to raise discussion,
not to force beliefs on each other,”
Amundsen said. |